Getty Images vs Zscaler, Inc.
Developer ecosystem comparison across GitHub activity, SDKs, documentation, community, reach and momentum.
Getty Images and Zscaler, Inc. both appear on the Smoower Developer Ecosystem Index.
Zscaler, Inc. (rank #298) holds a modest lead over Getty Images (rank #693) on the overall Smoower ecosystem score (45 vs 31). The gap of 14 points reflects composite signals across code, docs, community and reach.
On code quality (the state of repositories, tests, releases and polish), Zscaler, Inc. is clearly ahead of Getty Images. On education (docs, guides and learning material for developers), Zscaler, Inc. is slightly ahead of Getty Images. On community (issue response, PR reviews and discussion health), Zscaler, Inc. is ahead of Getty Images. On reach (how visible the ecosystem is beyond its own repos), Zscaler, Inc. is ahead of Getty Images. On momentum (release cadence and how fast the ecosystem moves), Zscaler, Inc. is clearly ahead of Getty Images.
Getty Images carries 951 GitHub stars across 32 public repos, with 5 repositories active in the last 90 days and 2 external contributors on record. Zscaler, Inc. shows 337 stars across 58 public repos, 33 active in the last 90 days and 11 external contributors.
Getty Images is worth a look for teams already invested in its stack. Zscaler, Inc. looks better where code quality is the deciding factor. The table below breaks the scores down pillar by pillar; the linked profiles cover the underlying repos, docs and community signals in full.
Side-by-side metrics
| Metric | Getty Images | Zscaler, Inc. |
|---|---|---|
| Ranking | ||
| Overall rank | #693 | #298 |
| Pillars | ||
| Overall | 31 | 45 |
| Code | 46 | 76 |
| Education | 61 | 65 |
| Community | 20 | 39 |
| Reach | 28 | 37 |
| Momentum | 15 | 40 |
| Builder experience | 0 | 0 |
| Signals | ||
| Stars | 951 | 337 |
| Forks | 497 | 199 |
| Public repos | 32 | 58 |
| Active repos (90d) | 5 | 33 |
| External contributors | 2 | 11 |
| Avg polish | 50 | 86 |
| Avg AI-readiness | 22 | 61 |