All the GIFs
Developer resources and open-source software projects made available by monday.com
Giphy vs monday.com
Developer ecosystem comparison across GitHub activity, SDKs, documentation, community, reach and momentum.
Giphy (All the GIFs) and monday.com (Developer resources and open-source software projects made available by monday.com) both appear on the Smoower Developer Ecosystem Index.
monday.com (rank #237) holds a narrow lead over Giphy (rank #372) on the overall Smoower ecosystem score (48 vs 42). The gap of 6 points reflects composite signals across code, docs, community and reach.
On code quality (the state of repositories, tests, releases and polish), monday.com is slightly ahead of Giphy. On education (docs, guides and learning material for developers), Giphy is slightly ahead of monday.com. On community (issue response, PR reviews and discussion health), monday.com is ahead of Giphy. On reach (how visible the ecosystem is beyond its own repos), monday.com is slightly ahead of Giphy. On momentum (release cadence and how fast the ecosystem moves), monday.com is ahead of Giphy.
Giphy carries 3,295 GitHub stars across 45 public repos, with 6 repositories active in the last 90 days and 5 external contributors on record. monday.com shows 1,854 stars across 46 public repos, 16 active in the last 90 days and 20 external contributors.
Giphy is the stronger read for anyone weighting education. monday.com looks better where community is the deciding factor. The table below breaks the scores down pillar by pillar; the linked profiles cover the underlying repos, docs and community signals in full.
Side-by-side metrics
| Metric | Giphy | monday.com |
|---|---|---|
| Ranking | ||
| Overall rank | #372 | #237 |
| Pillars | ||
| Overall | 42 | 48 |
| Code | 55 | 62 |
| Education | 56 | 52 |
| Community | 31 | 51 |
| Reach | 31 | 38 |
| Momentum | 12 | 30 |
| Builder experience | 0 | 0 |
| Signals | ||
| Stars | 3,295 | 1,854 |
| Forks | 603 | 807 |
| Public repos | 45 | 46 |
| Active repos (90d) | 6 | 16 |
| External contributors | 5 | 20 |
| Avg polish | 57 | 56 |
| Avg AI-readiness | 33 | 51 |