GoCardless vs Humaans
Developer ecosystem comparison across GitHub activity, SDKs, documentation, community, reach and momentum.
GoCardless and Humaans (A better workplace starts here) both appear on the Smoower Developer Ecosystem Index.
GoCardless (rank #372) holds a modest lead over Humaans (rank #662) on the overall Smoower ecosystem score (42 vs 32). The gap of 10 points reflects composite signals across code, docs, community and reach.
On code quality (the state of repositories, tests, releases and polish), Humaans is slightly ahead of GoCardless. On education (docs, guides and learning material for developers), Humaans is ahead of GoCardless. On community (issue response, PR reviews and discussion health), GoCardless is ahead of Humaans. On reach (how visible the ecosystem is beyond its own repos), GoCardless is ahead of Humaans. On momentum (release cadence and how fast the ecosystem moves), GoCardless is clearly ahead of Humaans.
GoCardless carries 6,977 GitHub stars across 161 public repos, with 19 repositories active in the last 90 days and 3 external contributors on record. Humaans shows 461 stars across 9 public repos, 4 active in the last 90 days and 2 external contributors. The star gap on its own does not decide the comparison, but GoCardless's footprint is roughly 15.1x larger, which usually shows up in downstream signals like inbound issues and third party integrations.
GoCardless is the stronger read for anyone weighting momentum. Humaans looks better where education is the deciding factor. The table below breaks the scores down pillar by pillar; the linked profiles cover the underlying repos, docs and community signals in full.
Side-by-side metrics
| Metric | GoCardless | Humaans |
|---|---|---|
| Ranking | ||
| Overall rank | #372 | #662 |
| Pillars | ||
| Overall | 42 | 32 |
| Code | 49 | 50 |
| Education | 54 | 71 |
| Community | 33 | 16 |
| Reach | 12 | 0 |
| Momentum | 60 | 24 |
| Builder experience | 0 | 0 |
| Signals | ||
| Stars | 6,977 | 461 |
| Forks | 1,173 | 18 |
| Public repos | 161 | 9 |
| Active repos (90d) | 19 | 4 |
| External contributors | 3 | 2 |
| Avg polish | 48 | 41 |
| Avg AI-readiness | 38 | 43 |