GoCardless vs Qualtrics
Developer ecosystem comparison across GitHub activity, SDKs, documentation, community, reach and momentum.
GoCardless and Qualtrics both appear on the Smoower Developer Ecosystem Index.
GoCardless (rank #372) holds a modest lead over Qualtrics (rank #693) on the overall Smoower ecosystem score (42 vs 31). The gap of 11 points reflects composite signals across code, docs, community and reach.
On code quality (the state of repositories, tests, releases and polish), GoCardless is clearly ahead of Qualtrics. On education (docs, guides and learning material for developers), GoCardless is ahead of Qualtrics. On community (issue response, PR reviews and discussion health), GoCardless is ahead of Qualtrics. On reach (how visible the ecosystem is beyond its own repos), Qualtrics is clearly ahead of GoCardless. On momentum (release cadence and how fast the ecosystem moves), GoCardless is clearly ahead of Qualtrics.
GoCardless carries 6,977 GitHub stars across 161 public repos, with 19 repositories active in the last 90 days and 3 external contributors on record. Qualtrics shows 20 stars across 20 public repos, 7 active in the last 90 days and 3 external contributors. The star gap on its own does not decide the comparison, but GoCardless's footprint is roughly 348.9x larger, which usually shows up in downstream signals like inbound issues and third party integrations.
GoCardless is the stronger read for anyone weighting momentum. Qualtrics looks better where reach is the deciding factor. The table below breaks the scores down pillar by pillar; the linked profiles cover the underlying repos, docs and community signals in full.
Side-by-side metrics
| Metric | GoCardless | Qualtrics |
|---|---|---|
| Ranking | ||
| Overall rank | #372 | #693 |
| Pillars | ||
| Overall | 42 | 31 |
| Code | 49 | 27 |
| Education | 54 | 40 |
| Community | 33 | 14 |
| Reach | 12 | 82 |
| Momentum | 60 | 18 |
| Builder experience | 0 | 0 |
| Signals | ||
| Stars | 6,977 | 20 |
| Forks | 1,173 | 13 |
| Public repos | 161 | 20 |
| Active repos (90d) | 19 | 7 |
| External contributors | 3 | 3 |
| Avg polish | 48 | 28 |
| Avg AI-readiness | 38 | 19 |