GoCardless vs UXPin
Developer ecosystem comparison across GitHub activity, SDKs, documentation, community, reach and momentum.
GoCardless and UXPin (The Full-Stack UX Design Platform) both appear on the Smoower Developer Ecosystem Index.
GoCardless (rank #372) holds a narrow lead over UXPin (rank #569) on the overall Smoower ecosystem score (42 vs 35). The gap of 7 points reflects composite signals across code, docs, community and reach.
On code quality (the state of repositories, tests, releases and polish), GoCardless is ahead of UXPin. On education (docs, guides and learning material for developers), UXPin is ahead of GoCardless. On community (issue response, PR reviews and discussion health), GoCardless is ahead of UXPin. On reach (how visible the ecosystem is beyond its own repos), UXPin is clearly ahead of GoCardless. On momentum (release cadence and how fast the ecosystem moves), GoCardless is clearly ahead of UXPin.
GoCardless carries 6,977 GitHub stars across 161 public repos, with 19 repositories active in the last 90 days and 3 external contributors on record. UXPin shows 879 stars across 25 public repos, 3 active in the last 90 days and 0 external contributors. The star gap on its own does not decide the comparison, but GoCardless's footprint is roughly 7.9x larger, which usually shows up in downstream signals like inbound issues and third party integrations.
GoCardless is the stronger read for anyone weighting momentum. UXPin looks better where reach is the deciding factor. The table below breaks the scores down pillar by pillar; the linked profiles cover the underlying repos, docs and community signals in full.
Side-by-side metrics
| Metric | GoCardless | UXPin |
|---|---|---|
| Ranking | ||
| Overall rank | #372 | #569 |
| Pillars | ||
| Overall | 42 | 35 |
| Code | 49 | 30 |
| Education | 54 | 66 |
| Community | 33 | 13 |
| Reach | 12 | 39 |
| Momentum | 60 | 34 |
| Builder experience | 0 | 0 |
| Signals | ||
| Stars | 6,977 | 879 |
| Forks | 1,173 | 117 |
| Public repos | 161 | 25 |
| Active repos (90d) | 19 | 3 |
| External contributors | 3 | 0 |
| Avg polish | 48 | 23 |
| Avg AI-readiness | 38 | 21 |