Developer samples for Google Workspace APIs
Google Workspace vs Odoo
Developer ecosystem comparison across GitHub activity, SDKs, documentation, community, reach and momentum.
Google Workspace (Developer samples for Google Workspace APIs) and Odoo (Open Source Business Apps) both appear on the Smoower Developer Ecosystem Index.
Google Workspace (rank #165) holds a modest lead over Odoo (rank #485) on the overall Smoower ecosystem score (51 vs 38). The gap of 13 points reflects composite signals across code, docs, community and reach.
On code quality (the state of repositories, tests, releases and polish), Google Workspace is clearly ahead of Odoo. On education (docs, guides and learning material for developers), Google Workspace is slightly ahead of Odoo. On community (issue response, PR reviews and discussion health), Odoo is slightly ahead of Google Workspace. On reach (how visible the ecosystem is beyond its own repos), Google Workspace is ahead of Odoo. On momentum (release cadence and how fast the ecosystem moves), Google Workspace is clearly ahead of Odoo.
Google Workspace carries 48,567 GitHub stars across 57 public repos, with 18 repositories active in the last 90 days and 37 external contributors on record. Odoo shows 59,467 stars across 43 public repos, 25 active in the last 90 days and 257 external contributors.
Google Workspace is the stronger read for anyone weighting code quality. Odoo looks better where community is the deciding factor. The table below breaks the scores down pillar by pillar; the linked profiles cover the underlying repos, docs and community signals in full.
Side-by-side metrics
| Metric | Google Workspace | Odoo |
|---|---|---|
| Ranking | ||
| Overall rank | #165 | #485 |
| Pillars | ||
| Overall | 51 | 38 |
| Code | 70 | 41 |
| Education | 54 | 52 |
| Community | 50 | 54 |
| Reach | 46 | 30 |
| Momentum | 62 | 36 |
| Builder experience | 0 | 0 |
| Signals | ||
| Stars | 48,567 | 59,467 |
| Forks | 9,208 | 52,908 |
| Public repos | 57 | 43 |
| Active repos (90d) | 18 | 25 |
| External contributors | 37 | 257 |
| Avg polish | 80 | 45 |
| Avg AI-readiness | 39 | 22 |