Grammarly vs LinkedIn

Grammarly (Millions of users rely on Grammarly's AI-powered products to make their messages, documents, and social media posts clear, mistake-free, and impactful.) and LinkedIn both appear on the Smoower Developer Ecosystem Index.

LinkedIn (rank #338) holds a modest lead over Grammarly (rank #602) on the overall Smoower ecosystem score (43 vs 34). The gap of 9 points reflects composite signals across code, docs, community and reach.

On code quality (the state of repositories, tests, releases and polish), LinkedIn is ahead of Grammarly. On education (docs, guides and learning material for developers), Grammarly is slightly ahead of LinkedIn. On community (issue response, PR reviews and discussion health), LinkedIn is clearly ahead of Grammarly. On reach (how visible the ecosystem is beyond its own repos), LinkedIn is clearly ahead of Grammarly. On momentum (release cadence and how fast the ecosystem moves), LinkedIn is ahead of Grammarly.

Grammarly carries 4,355 GitHub stars across 23 public repos, with 0 repositories active in the last 90 days and 0 external contributors on record. LinkedIn shows 77,785 stars across 137 public repos, 28 active in the last 90 days and 52 external contributors. The star gap on its own does not decide the comparison, but LinkedIn's footprint is roughly 17.9x larger, which usually shows up in downstream signals like inbound issues and third party integrations.

Grammarly is the stronger read for anyone weighting education. LinkedIn looks better where reach is the deciding factor. The table below breaks the scores down pillar by pillar; the linked profiles cover the underlying repos, docs and community signals in full.