Grammarly vs Quo

Grammarly (Millions of users rely on Grammarly's AI-powered products to make their messages, documents, and social media posts clear, mistake-free, and impactful.) and Quo (World's best business phone app) both appear on the Smoower Developer Ecosystem Index.

Grammarly (rank #600) holds a narrow lead over Quo (rank #668) on the overall Smoower ecosystem score (34 vs 32). The gap of 2 points reflects composite signals across code, docs, community and reach.

On code quality (the state of repositories, tests, releases and polish), Grammarly is ahead of Quo. On education (docs, guides and learning material for developers), Grammarly is ahead of Quo. On community (issue response, PR reviews and discussion health), Grammarly is ahead of Quo. On reach (how visible the ecosystem is beyond its own repos), Quo is slightly ahead of Grammarly. On momentum (release cadence and how fast the ecosystem moves), Quo is slightly ahead of Grammarly.

Grammarly carries 4,356 GitHub stars across 23 public repos, with 0 repositories active in the last 90 days and 0 external contributors on record. Quo shows 12 stars across 20 public repos, 1 active in the last 90 days and 0 external contributors. The star gap on its own does not decide the comparison, but Grammarly's footprint is roughly 363.0x larger, which usually shows up in downstream signals like inbound issues and third party integrations.

Grammarly is the stronger read for anyone weighting community. Quo looks better where reach is the deciding factor. The table below breaks the scores down pillar by pillar; the linked profiles cover the underlying repos, docs and community signals in full.