Grammarly vs ReadMe

Grammarly (Millions of users rely on Grammarly's AI-powered products to make their messages, documents, and social media posts clear, mistake-free, and impactful.) and ReadMe (Interactive developer hubs that help users succeed with your APIs 🦉) both appear on the Smoower Developer Ecosystem Index.

ReadMe (rank #257) holds a modest lead over Grammarly (rank #602) on the overall Smoower ecosystem score (47 vs 34). The gap of 13 points reflects composite signals across code, docs, community and reach.

On code quality (the state of repositories, tests, releases and polish), ReadMe is clearly ahead of Grammarly. On education (docs, guides and learning material for developers), ReadMe is clearly ahead of Grammarly. On community (issue response, PR reviews and discussion health), ReadMe is ahead of Grammarly. On reach (how visible the ecosystem is beyond its own repos), Grammarly is ahead of ReadMe. On momentum (release cadence and how fast the ecosystem moves), ReadMe is ahead of Grammarly.

Grammarly carries 4,355 GitHub stars across 23 public repos, with 0 repositories active in the last 90 days and 0 external contributors on record. ReadMe shows 1,824 stars across 106 public repos, 26 active in the last 90 days and 21 external contributors.

Grammarly is the stronger read for anyone weighting reach. ReadMe looks better where code quality is the deciding factor. The table below breaks the scores down pillar by pillar; the linked profiles cover the underlying repos, docs and community signals in full.