Millions of users rely on Grammarly's AI-powered products to make their messages, documents, and social media posts clear, mistake-free, and impactful.
Grammarly vs Sage
Developer ecosystem comparison across GitHub activity, SDKs, documentation, community, reach and momentum.
Grammarly (Millions of users rely on Grammarly's AI-powered products to make their messages, documents, and social media posts clear, mistake-free, and impactful.) and Sage both appear on the Smoower Developer Ecosystem Index.
Grammarly (rank #600) holds a narrow lead over Sage (rank #625) on the overall Smoower ecosystem score (34 vs 33). The gap of 1 points reflects composite signals across code, docs, community and reach.
On code quality (the state of repositories, tests, releases and polish), Sage is ahead of Grammarly. On education (docs, guides and learning material for developers), Grammarly is slightly ahead of Sage. On community (issue response, PR reviews and discussion health), Sage is slightly ahead of Grammarly. On reach (how visible the ecosystem is beyond its own repos), Grammarly is ahead of Sage. On momentum (release cadence and how fast the ecosystem moves), Grammarly is ahead of Sage.
Grammarly carries 4,356 GitHub stars across 23 public repos, with 0 repositories active in the last 90 days and 0 external contributors on record. Sage shows 2,183 stars across 122 public repos, 6 active in the last 90 days and 22 external contributors.
Grammarly is the stronger read for anyone weighting momentum. Sage looks better where code quality is the deciding factor. The table below breaks the scores down pillar by pillar; the linked profiles cover the underlying repos, docs and community signals in full.
Side-by-side metrics
| Metric | Grammarly | Sage |
|---|---|---|
| Ranking | ||
| Overall rank | #600 | #625 |
| Pillars | ||
| Overall | 34 | 33 |
| Code | 43 | 56 |
| Education | 55 | 52 |
| Community | 27 | 34 |
| Reach | 37 | 23 |
| Momentum | 28 | 12 |
| Builder experience | 0 | 0 |
| Signals | ||
| Stars | 4,356 | 2,183 |
| Forks | 469 | 429 |
| Public repos | 23 | 122 |
| Active repos (90d) | 0 | 6 |
| External contributors | 0 | 22 |
| Avg polish | 45 | 52 |
| Avg AI-readiness | 30 | 38 |