Grammarly vs Starling Bank

Grammarly (Millions of users rely on Grammarly's AI-powered products to make their messages, documents, and social media posts clear, mistake-free, and impactful.) and Starling Bank both appear on the Smoower Developer Ecosystem Index.

Grammarly (rank #600) holds a narrow lead over Starling Bank (rank #625) on the overall Smoower ecosystem score (34 vs 33). The gap of 1 points reflects composite signals across code, docs, community and reach.

On code quality (the state of repositories, tests, releases and polish), Starling Bank is slightly ahead of Grammarly. On community (issue response, PR reviews and discussion health), Grammarly is ahead of Starling Bank. On reach (how visible the ecosystem is beyond its own repos), Starling Bank is clearly ahead of Grammarly. On momentum (release cadence and how fast the ecosystem moves), Starling Bank is ahead of Grammarly.

Grammarly carries 4,356 GitHub stars across 23 public repos, with 0 repositories active in the last 90 days and 0 external contributors on record. Starling Bank shows 195 stars across 3 public repos, 3 active in the last 90 days and 0 external contributors. The star gap on its own does not decide the comparison, but Grammarly's footprint is roughly 22.3x larger, which usually shows up in downstream signals like inbound issues and third party integrations.

Grammarly is the stronger read for anyone weighting community. Starling Bank looks better where reach is the deciding factor. The table below breaks the scores down pillar by pillar; the linked profiles cover the underlying repos, docs and community signals in full.