Grammarly vs Thomson Reuters

Grammarly (Millions of users rely on Grammarly's AI-powered products to make their messages, documents, and social media posts clear, mistake-free, and impactful.) and Thomson Reuters both appear on the Smoower Developer Ecosystem Index.

Grammarly (rank #600) holds a narrow lead over Thomson Reuters (rank #625) on the overall Smoower ecosystem score (34 vs 33). The gap of 1 points reflects composite signals across code, docs, community and reach.

On code quality (the state of repositories, tests, releases and polish), Thomson Reuters is slightly ahead of Grammarly. On education (docs, guides and learning material for developers), Thomson Reuters is ahead of Grammarly. On community (issue response, PR reviews and discussion health), Grammarly is slightly ahead of Thomson Reuters. On reach (how visible the ecosystem is beyond its own repos), Thomson Reuters is slightly ahead of Grammarly. On momentum (release cadence and how fast the ecosystem moves), Grammarly is ahead of Thomson Reuters.

Grammarly carries 4,356 GitHub stars across 23 public repos, with 0 repositories active in the last 90 days and 0 external contributors on record. Thomson Reuters shows 438 stars across 144 public repos, 8 active in the last 90 days and 0 external contributors. The star gap on its own does not decide the comparison, but Grammarly's footprint is roughly 9.9x larger, which usually shows up in downstream signals like inbound issues and third party integrations.

Grammarly is the stronger read for anyone weighting momentum. Thomson Reuters looks better where education is the deciding factor. The table below breaks the scores down pillar by pillar; the linked profiles cover the underlying repos, docs and community signals in full.