Grammarly vs Typeform

Grammarly (Millions of users rely on Grammarly's AI-powered products to make their messages, documents, and social media posts clear, mistake-free, and impactful.) and Typeform both appear on the Smoower Developer Ecosystem Index.

Typeform (rank #189) holds a modest lead over Grammarly (rank #602) on the overall Smoower ecosystem score (50 vs 34). The gap of 16 points reflects composite signals across code, docs, community and reach.

On code quality (the state of repositories, tests, releases and polish), Typeform is clearly ahead of Grammarly. On education (docs, guides and learning material for developers), Grammarly is slightly ahead of Typeform. On community (issue response, PR reviews and discussion health), Grammarly is slightly ahead of Typeform. On reach (how visible the ecosystem is beyond its own repos), Typeform is slightly ahead of Grammarly. On momentum (release cadence and how fast the ecosystem moves), Typeform is slightly ahead of Grammarly.

Grammarly carries 4,355 GitHub stars across 23 public repos, with 0 repositories active in the last 90 days and 0 external contributors on record. Typeform shows 590 stars across 40 public repos, 8 active in the last 90 days and 5 external contributors. The star gap on its own does not decide the comparison, but Grammarly's footprint is roughly 7.4x larger, which usually shows up in downstream signals like inbound issues and third party integrations.

Grammarly is the stronger read for anyone weighting education. Typeform looks better where code quality is the deciding factor. The table below breaks the scores down pillar by pillar; the linked profiles cover the underlying repos, docs and community signals in full.