The most powerful form and workflow solution available for WordPress.
Gravity Forms vs Iterable
Developer ecosystem comparison across GitHub activity, SDKs, documentation, community, reach and momentum.
Gravity Forms (The most powerful form and workflow solution available for WordPress.) and Iterable both appear on the Smoower Developer Ecosystem Index.
Iterable (rank #317) holds a modest lead over Gravity Forms (rank #662) on the overall Smoower ecosystem score (44 vs 32). The gap of 12 points reflects composite signals across code, docs, community and reach.
On code quality (the state of repositories, tests, releases and polish), Iterable is clearly ahead of Gravity Forms. On education (docs, guides and learning material for developers), Gravity Forms is ahead of Iterable. On community (issue response, PR reviews and discussion health), Iterable is clearly ahead of Gravity Forms. On reach (how visible the ecosystem is beyond its own repos), Gravity Forms is ahead of Iterable. On momentum (release cadence and how fast the ecosystem moves), Iterable is ahead of Gravity Forms.
Gravity Forms carries 112 GitHub stars across 8 public repos, with 2 repositories active in the last 90 days and 1 external contributors on record. Iterable shows 269 stars across 100 public repos, 16 active in the last 90 days and 10 external contributors.
Gravity Forms is the stronger read for anyone weighting education. Iterable looks better where code quality is the deciding factor. The table below breaks the scores down pillar by pillar; the linked profiles cover the underlying repos, docs and community signals in full.
Side-by-side metrics
| Metric | Gravity Forms | Iterable |
|---|---|---|
| Ranking | ||
| Overall rank | #662 | #317 |
| Pillars | ||
| Overall | 32 | 44 |
| Code | 21 | 51 |
| Education | 78 | 59 |
| Community | 12 | 35 |
| Reach | 29 | 16 |
| Momentum | 40 | 58 |
| Builder experience | 0 | 0 |
| Signals | ||
| Stars | 112 | 269 |
| Forks | 66 | 212 |
| Public repos | 8 | 100 |
| Active repos (90d) | 2 | 16 |
| External contributors | 1 | 10 |
| Avg polish | 24 | 53 |
| Avg AI-readiness | 8 | 34 |