The most powerful form and workflow solution available for WordPress.
Join LiveChat Developer Program https://platform.text.com/
Gravity Forms vs LiveChat
Developer ecosystem comparison across GitHub activity, SDKs, documentation, community, reach and momentum.
Gravity Forms (The most powerful form and workflow solution available for WordPress.) and LiveChat (Join LiveChat Developer Program https://platform.text.com/) both appear on the Smoower Developer Ecosystem Index.
LiveChat (rank #141) holds a meaningful lead over Gravity Forms (rank #662) on the overall Smoower ecosystem score (53 vs 32). The gap of 21 points reflects composite signals across code, docs, community and reach.
On code quality (the state of repositories, tests, releases and polish), LiveChat is clearly ahead of Gravity Forms. On education (docs, guides and learning material for developers), LiveChat is slightly ahead of Gravity Forms. On community (issue response, PR reviews and discussion health), LiveChat is clearly ahead of Gravity Forms. On reach (how visible the ecosystem is beyond its own repos), LiveChat is clearly ahead of Gravity Forms. On momentum (release cadence and how fast the ecosystem moves), Gravity Forms is slightly ahead of LiveChat.
Gravity Forms carries 112 GitHub stars across 8 public repos, with 2 repositories active in the last 90 days and 1 external contributors on record. LiveChat shows 755 stars across 168 public repos, 24 active in the last 90 days and 13 external contributors. The star gap on its own does not decide the comparison, but LiveChat's footprint is roughly 6.7x larger, which usually shows up in downstream signals like inbound issues and third party integrations.
Gravity Forms is the stronger read for anyone weighting momentum. LiveChat looks better where code quality is the deciding factor. The table below breaks the scores down pillar by pillar; the linked profiles cover the underlying repos, docs and community signals in full.
Side-by-side metrics
| Metric | Gravity Forms | LiveChat |
|---|---|---|
| Ranking | ||
| Overall rank | #662 | #141 |
| Pillars | ||
| Overall | 32 | 53 |
| Code | 21 | 54 |
| Education | 78 | 80 |
| Community | 12 | 36 |
| Reach | 29 | 50 |
| Momentum | 40 | 35 |
| Builder experience | 0 | 0 |
| Signals | ||
| Stars | 112 | 755 |
| Forks | 66 | 335 |
| Public repos | 8 | 168 |
| Active repos (90d) | 2 | 24 |
| External contributors | 1 | 13 |
| Avg polish | 24 | 55 |
| Avg AI-readiness | 8 | 37 |