Gravity Forms vs Mollie

Gravity Forms (The most powerful form and workflow solution available for WordPress.) and Mollie (Building a payments and banking stack for makers.) both appear on the Smoower Developer Ecosystem Index.

Mollie (rank #122) holds a meaningful lead over Gravity Forms (rank #662) on the overall Smoower ecosystem score (54 vs 32). The gap of 22 points reflects composite signals across code, docs, community and reach.

On code quality (the state of repositories, tests, releases and polish), Mollie is clearly ahead of Gravity Forms. On education (docs, guides and learning material for developers), Mollie is slightly ahead of Gravity Forms. On community (issue response, PR reviews and discussion health), Mollie is clearly ahead of Gravity Forms. On reach (how visible the ecosystem is beyond its own repos), Gravity Forms is slightly ahead of Mollie. On momentum (release cadence and how fast the ecosystem moves), Gravity Forms is slightly ahead of Mollie.

Gravity Forms carries 112 GitHub stars across 8 public repos, with 2 repositories active in the last 90 days and 1 external contributors on record. Mollie shows 2,571 stars across 85 public repos, 30 active in the last 90 days and 26 external contributors. The star gap on its own does not decide the comparison, but Mollie's footprint is roughly 23.0x larger, which usually shows up in downstream signals like inbound issues and third party integrations.

Gravity Forms is the stronger read for anyone weighting reach. Mollie looks better where code quality is the deciding factor. The table below breaks the scores down pillar by pillar; the linked profiles cover the underlying repos, docs and community signals in full.