Gravity Forms vs Moodle Development

Gravity Forms (The most powerful form and workflow solution available for WordPress.) and Moodle Development both appear on the Smoower Developer Ecosystem Index.

Moodle Development (rank #625) holds a narrow lead over Gravity Forms (rank #668) on the overall Smoower ecosystem score (33 vs 32). The gap of 1 points reflects composite signals across code, docs, community and reach.

On code quality (the state of repositories, tests, releases and polish), Moodle Development is clearly ahead of Gravity Forms. On education (docs, guides and learning material for developers), Gravity Forms is clearly ahead of Moodle Development. On community (issue response, PR reviews and discussion health), Moodle Development is clearly ahead of Gravity Forms. On reach (how visible the ecosystem is beyond its own repos), Gravity Forms is slightly ahead of Moodle Development. On momentum (release cadence and how fast the ecosystem moves), Gravity Forms is clearly ahead of Moodle Development.

Gravity Forms carries 112 GitHub stars across 8 public repos, with 2 repositories active in the last 90 days and 1 external contributors on record. Moodle Development shows 7,373 stars across 15 public repos, 2 active in the last 90 days and 26 external contributors. The star gap on its own does not decide the comparison, but Moodle Development's footprint is roughly 65.8x larger, which usually shows up in downstream signals like inbound issues and third party integrations.

Gravity Forms is the stronger read for anyone weighting momentum. Moodle Development looks better where community is the deciding factor. The table below breaks the scores down pillar by pillar; the linked profiles cover the underlying repos, docs and community signals in full.