The most powerful form and workflow solution available for WordPress.
Gravity Forms vs mParticle by Rokt
Developer ecosystem comparison across GitHub activity, SDKs, documentation, community, reach and momentum.
Gravity Forms (The most powerful form and workflow solution available for WordPress.) and mParticle by Rokt both appear on the Smoower Developer Ecosystem Index.
mParticle by Rokt (rank #338) holds a modest lead over Gravity Forms (rank #662) on the overall Smoower ecosystem score (43 vs 32). The gap of 11 points reflects composite signals across code, docs, community and reach.
On code quality (the state of repositories, tests, releases and polish), mParticle by Rokt is clearly ahead of Gravity Forms. On education (docs, guides and learning material for developers), Gravity Forms is ahead of mParticle by Rokt. On community (issue response, PR reviews and discussion health), mParticle by Rokt is clearly ahead of Gravity Forms. On reach (how visible the ecosystem is beyond its own repos), Gravity Forms is slightly ahead of mParticle by Rokt. On momentum (release cadence and how fast the ecosystem moves), Gravity Forms is ahead of mParticle by Rokt.
Gravity Forms carries 112 GitHub stars across 8 public repos, with 2 repositories active in the last 90 days and 1 external contributors on record. mParticle by Rokt shows 317 stars across 85 public repos, 14 active in the last 90 days and 21 external contributors.
Gravity Forms is the stronger read for anyone weighting education. mParticle by Rokt looks better where code quality is the deciding factor. The table below breaks the scores down pillar by pillar; the linked profiles cover the underlying repos, docs and community signals in full.
Side-by-side metrics
| Metric | Gravity Forms | mParticle by Rokt |
|---|---|---|
| Ranking | ||
| Overall rank | #662 | #338 |
| Pillars | ||
| Overall | 32 | 43 |
| Code | 21 | 59 |
| Education | 78 | 63 |
| Community | 12 | 38 |
| Reach | 29 | 28 |
| Momentum | 40 | 27 |
| Builder experience | 0 | 0 |
| Signals | ||
| Stars | 112 | 317 |
| Forks | 66 | 521 |
| Public repos | 8 | 85 |
| Active repos (90d) | 2 | 14 |
| External contributors | 1 | 21 |
| Avg polish | 24 | 62 |
| Avg AI-readiness | 8 | 50 |