The most powerful form and workflow solution available for WordPress.
Gravity Forms vs SnapLogic
Developer ecosystem comparison across GitHub activity, SDKs, documentation, community, reach and momentum.
Gravity Forms (The most powerful form and workflow solution available for WordPress.) and SnapLogic both appear on the Smoower Developer Ecosystem Index.
SnapLogic (rank #536) holds a narrow lead over Gravity Forms (rank #662) on the overall Smoower ecosystem score (36 vs 32). The gap of 4 points reflects composite signals across code, docs, community and reach.
On code quality (the state of repositories, tests, releases and polish), SnapLogic is ahead of Gravity Forms. On education (docs, guides and learning material for developers), Gravity Forms is slightly ahead of SnapLogic. On community (issue response, PR reviews and discussion health), SnapLogic is clearly ahead of Gravity Forms. On reach (how visible the ecosystem is beyond its own repos), Gravity Forms is slightly ahead of SnapLogic. On momentum (release cadence and how fast the ecosystem moves), Gravity Forms is slightly ahead of SnapLogic.
Gravity Forms carries 112 GitHub stars across 8 public repos, with 2 repositories active in the last 90 days and 1 external contributors on record. SnapLogic shows 40 stars across 34 public repos, 3 active in the last 90 days and 3 external contributors.
Gravity Forms is the stronger read for anyone weighting reach. SnapLogic looks better where community is the deciding factor. The table below breaks the scores down pillar by pillar; the linked profiles cover the underlying repos, docs and community signals in full.
Side-by-side metrics
| Metric | Gravity Forms | SnapLogic |
|---|---|---|
| Ranking | ||
| Overall rank | #662 | #536 |
| Pillars | ||
| Overall | 32 | 36 |
| Code | 21 | 34 |
| Education | 78 | 71 |
| Community | 12 | 38 |
| Reach | 29 | 21 |
| Momentum | 40 | 34 |
| Builder experience | 0 | 0 |
| Signals | ||
| Stars | 112 | 40 |
| Forks | 66 | 38 |
| Public repos | 8 | 34 |
| Active repos (90d) | 2 | 3 |
| External contributors | 1 | 3 |
| Avg polish | 24 | 35 |
| Avg AI-readiness | 8 | 22 |