Developer ecosystem comparison
vs

Gravity Forms vs Squarespace

Developer ecosystem comparison across GitHub activity, SDKs, documentation, community, reach and momentum.

Gravity Forms (The most powerful form and workflow solution available for WordPress.) and Squarespace both appear on the Smoower Developer Ecosystem Index.

Squarespace (rank #536) holds a narrow lead over Gravity Forms (rank #662) on the overall Smoower ecosystem score (36 vs 32). The gap of 4 points reflects composite signals across code, docs, community and reach.

On code quality (the state of repositories, tests, releases and polish), Squarespace is ahead of Gravity Forms. On education (docs, guides and learning material for developers), Gravity Forms is ahead of Squarespace. On community (issue response, PR reviews and discussion health), Squarespace is ahead of Gravity Forms.

Gravity Forms carries 112 GitHub stars across 8 public repos, with 2 repositories active in the last 90 days and 1 external contributors on record. Squarespace shows 2,038 stars across 98 public repos, 6 active in the last 90 days and 1 external contributors. The star gap on its own does not decide the comparison, but Squarespace's footprint is roughly 18.2x larger, which usually shows up in downstream signals like inbound issues and third party integrations.

Gravity Forms is the stronger read for anyone weighting education. Squarespace looks better where code quality is the deciding factor. The table below breaks the scores down pillar by pillar; the linked profiles cover the underlying repos, docs and community signals in full.

Side-by-side metrics

MetricGravity FormsSquarespace
Ranking
Overall rank#662#536
Pillars
Overall3236
Code2135
Education7864
Community1221
Reach2929
Momentum4040
Builder experience00
Signals
Stars1122,038
Forks66568
Public repos898
Active repos (90d)26
External contributors11
Avg polish2437
Avg AI-readiness822

Fork ecosystems

Loading fork ecosystem…
Loading fork ecosystem…
View Gravity Forms developer profileView Squarespace developer profile