The most powerful form and workflow solution available for WordPress.
Gravity Forms vs Stripe Samples
Developer ecosystem comparison across GitHub activity, SDKs, documentation, community, reach and momentum.
Gravity Forms (The most powerful form and workflow solution available for WordPress.) and Stripe Samples (Sample integrations built by Stripe.) both appear on the Smoower Developer Ecosystem Index.
Stripe Samples (rank #141) holds a meaningful lead over Gravity Forms (rank #662) on the overall Smoower ecosystem score (53 vs 32). The gap of 21 points reflects composite signals across code, docs, community and reach.
On code quality (the state of repositories, tests, releases and polish), Stripe Samples is clearly ahead of Gravity Forms. On education (docs, guides and learning material for developers), Stripe Samples is slightly ahead of Gravity Forms. On community (issue response, PR reviews and discussion health), Stripe Samples is clearly ahead of Gravity Forms. On reach (how visible the ecosystem is beyond its own repos), Gravity Forms is clearly ahead of Stripe Samples. On momentum (release cadence and how fast the ecosystem moves), Stripe Samples is ahead of Gravity Forms.
Gravity Forms carries 112 GitHub stars across 8 public repos, with 2 repositories active in the last 90 days and 1 external contributors on record. Stripe Samples shows 4,227 stars across 30 public repos, 23 active in the last 90 days and 8 external contributors. The star gap on its own does not decide the comparison, but Stripe Samples's footprint is roughly 37.7x larger, which usually shows up in downstream signals like inbound issues and third party integrations.
Gravity Forms is the stronger read for anyone weighting reach. Stripe Samples looks better where code quality is the deciding factor. The table below breaks the scores down pillar by pillar; the linked profiles cover the underlying repos, docs and community signals in full.
Side-by-side metrics
| Metric | Gravity Forms | Stripe Samples |
|---|---|---|
| Ranking | ||
| Overall rank | #662 | #141 |
| Pillars | ||
| Overall | 32 | 53 |
| Code | 21 | 66 |
| Education | 78 | 85 |
| Community | 12 | 47 |
| Reach | 29 | 8 |
| Momentum | 40 | 52 |
| Builder experience | 0 | 0 |
| Signals | ||
| Stars | 112 | 4,227 |
| Forks | 66 | 2,301 |
| Public repos | 8 | 30 |
| Active repos (90d) | 2 | 23 |
| External contributors | 1 | 8 |
| Avg polish | 24 | 76 |
| Avg AI-readiness | 8 | 34 |