Gravity Forms vs Swimlane

Gravity Forms (The most powerful form and workflow solution available for WordPress.) and Swimlane (Swimlane is a Security Automation and Orchestration platform) both appear on the Smoower Developer Ecosystem Index.

Swimlane (rank #141) holds a meaningful lead over Gravity Forms (rank #662) on the overall Smoower ecosystem score (53 vs 32). The gap of 21 points reflects composite signals across code, docs, community and reach.

On code quality (the state of repositories, tests, releases and polish), Swimlane is clearly ahead of Gravity Forms. On education (docs, guides and learning material for developers), Gravity Forms is ahead of Swimlane. On community (issue response, PR reviews and discussion health), Swimlane is clearly ahead of Gravity Forms. On reach (how visible the ecosystem is beyond its own repos), Gravity Forms is slightly ahead of Swimlane. On momentum (release cadence and how fast the ecosystem moves), Gravity Forms is ahead of Swimlane.

Gravity Forms carries 112 GitHub stars across 8 public repos, with 2 repositories active in the last 90 days and 1 external contributors on record. Swimlane shows 14,614 stars across 128 public repos, 10 active in the last 90 days and 11 external contributors. The star gap on its own does not decide the comparison, but Swimlane's footprint is roughly 130.5x larger, which usually shows up in downstream signals like inbound issues and third party integrations.

Gravity Forms is the stronger read for anyone weighting education. Swimlane looks better where code quality is the deciding factor. The table below breaks the scores down pillar by pillar; the linked profiles cover the underlying repos, docs and community signals in full.