Gravity Forms vs Thomson Reuters

Gravity Forms (The most powerful form and workflow solution available for WordPress.) and Thomson Reuters both appear on the Smoower Developer Ecosystem Index.

Thomson Reuters (rank #625) holds a narrow lead over Gravity Forms (rank #668) on the overall Smoower ecosystem score (33 vs 32). The gap of 1 points reflects composite signals across code, docs, community and reach.

On code quality (the state of repositories, tests, releases and polish), Thomson Reuters is clearly ahead of Gravity Forms. On education (docs, guides and learning material for developers), Gravity Forms is ahead of Thomson Reuters. On community (issue response, PR reviews and discussion health), Thomson Reuters is ahead of Gravity Forms. On reach (how visible the ecosystem is beyond its own repos), Thomson Reuters is ahead of Gravity Forms. On momentum (release cadence and how fast the ecosystem moves), Gravity Forms is clearly ahead of Thomson Reuters.

Gravity Forms carries 112 GitHub stars across 8 public repos, with 2 repositories active in the last 90 days and 1 external contributors on record. Thomson Reuters shows 438 stars across 144 public repos, 8 active in the last 90 days and 0 external contributors. The star gap on its own does not decide the comparison, but Thomson Reuters's footprint is roughly 3.9x larger, which usually shows up in downstream signals like inbound issues and third party integrations.

Gravity Forms is the stronger read for anyone weighting momentum. Thomson Reuters looks better where code quality is the deciding factor. The table below breaks the scores down pillar by pillar; the linked profiles cover the underlying repos, docs and community signals in full.