Gravity Forms vs UXPin

Gravity Forms (The most powerful form and workflow solution available for WordPress.) and UXPin (The Full-Stack UX Design Platform) both appear on the Smoower Developer Ecosystem Index.

UXPin (rank #569) holds a narrow lead over Gravity Forms (rank #662) on the overall Smoower ecosystem score (35 vs 32). The gap of 3 points reflects composite signals across code, docs, community and reach.

On code quality (the state of repositories, tests, releases and polish), UXPin is ahead of Gravity Forms. On education (docs, guides and learning material for developers), Gravity Forms is ahead of UXPin. On community (issue response, PR reviews and discussion health), UXPin is slightly ahead of Gravity Forms. On reach (how visible the ecosystem is beyond its own repos), UXPin is ahead of Gravity Forms. On momentum (release cadence and how fast the ecosystem moves), Gravity Forms is slightly ahead of UXPin.

Gravity Forms carries 112 GitHub stars across 8 public repos, with 2 repositories active in the last 90 days and 1 external contributors on record. UXPin shows 879 stars across 25 public repos, 3 active in the last 90 days and 0 external contributors. The star gap on its own does not decide the comparison, but UXPin's footprint is roughly 7.8x larger, which usually shows up in downstream signals like inbound issues and third party integrations.

Gravity Forms is the stronger read for anyone weighting education. UXPin looks better where reach is the deciding factor. The table below breaks the scores down pillar by pillar; the linked profiles cover the underlying repos, docs and community signals in full.