Gravity Forms vs Workable

Gravity Forms (The most powerful form and workflow solution available for WordPress.) and Workable both appear on the Smoower Developer Ecosystem Index.

Workable (rank #569) holds a narrow lead over Gravity Forms (rank #662) on the overall Smoower ecosystem score (35 vs 32). The gap of 3 points reflects composite signals across code, docs, community and reach.

On code quality (the state of repositories, tests, releases and polish), Workable is clearly ahead of Gravity Forms. On education (docs, guides and learning material for developers), Gravity Forms is clearly ahead of Workable. On community (issue response, PR reviews and discussion health), Workable is ahead of Gravity Forms. On reach (how visible the ecosystem is beyond its own repos), Workable is ahead of Gravity Forms. On momentum (release cadence and how fast the ecosystem moves), Gravity Forms is ahead of Workable.

Gravity Forms carries 112 GitHub stars across 8 public repos, with 2 repositories active in the last 90 days and 1 external contributors on record. Workable shows 785 stars across 96 public repos, 5 active in the last 90 days and 5 external contributors. The star gap on its own does not decide the comparison, but Workable's footprint is roughly 7.0x larger, which usually shows up in downstream signals like inbound issues and third party integrations.

Gravity Forms is the stronger read for anyone weighting education. Workable looks better where code quality is the deciding factor. The table below breaks the scores down pillar by pillar; the linked profiles cover the underlying repos, docs and community signals in full.