Guesty vs Increase
Developer ecosystem comparison across GitHub activity, SDKs, documentation, community, reach and momentum.
Guesty and Increase (Build your bank) both appear on the Smoower Developer Ecosystem Index.
Increase (rank #55) holds a meaningful lead over Guesty (rank #662) on the overall Smoower ecosystem score (60 vs 32). The gap of 28 points reflects composite signals across code, docs, community and reach.
On code quality (the state of repositories, tests, releases and polish), Increase is ahead of Guesty. On education (docs, guides and learning material for developers), Guesty is slightly ahead of Increase. On community (issue response, PR reviews and discussion health), Increase is clearly ahead of Guesty. On reach (how visible the ecosystem is beyond its own repos), Increase is clearly ahead of Guesty. On momentum (release cadence and how fast the ecosystem moves), Increase is clearly ahead of Guesty.
Guesty carries 1 GitHub stars across 21 public repos, with 1 repositories active in the last 90 days and 1 external contributors on record. Increase shows 45 stars across 12 public repos, 11 active in the last 90 days and 5 external contributors. The star gap on its own does not decide the comparison, but Increase's footprint is roughly 45.0x larger, which usually shows up in downstream signals like inbound issues and third party integrations.
Guesty is the stronger read for anyone weighting education. Increase looks better where reach is the deciding factor. The table below breaks the scores down pillar by pillar; the linked profiles cover the underlying repos, docs and community signals in full.
Side-by-side metrics
| Metric | Guesty | Increase |
|---|---|---|
| Ranking | ||
| Overall rank | #662 | #55 |
| Pillars | ||
| Overall | 32 | 60 |
| Code | 36 | 52 |
| Education | 67 | 59 |
| Community | 28 | 68 |
| Reach | 0 | 79 |
| Momentum | 20 | 43 |
| Builder experience | 0 | 0 |
| Signals | ||
| Stars | 1 | 45 |
| Forks | 22 | 15 |
| Public repos | 21 | 12 |
| Active repos (90d) | 1 | 11 |
| External contributors | 1 | 5 |
| Avg polish | 27 | 48 |
| Avg AI-readiness | 36 | 47 |