Guild AI vs litellm
Developer ecosystem comparison across GitHub activity, SDKs, documentation, community, reach and momentum.
Guild AI and litellm both appear on the Smoower Developer Ecosystem Index.
Guild AI (rank #763) holds a meaningful lead over litellm (rank #1114) on the overall Smoower ecosystem score (29 vs 7). The gap of 22 points reflects composite signals across code, docs, community and reach.
On code quality (the state of repositories, tests, releases and polish), Guild AI is clearly ahead of litellm. On education (docs, guides and learning material for developers), Guild AI is clearly ahead of litellm. On community (issue response, PR reviews and discussion health), Guild AI is clearly ahead of litellm. On reach (how visible the ecosystem is beyond its own repos), litellm is clearly ahead of Guild AI.
Guild AI carries 1,003 GitHub stars across 29 public repos, with 0 repositories active in the last 90 days and 1 external contributors on record. litellm shows 0 stars across 0 public repos, 0 active in the last 90 days and 0 external contributors.
Guild AI is the stronger read for anyone weighting education. litellm looks better where reach is the deciding factor. The table below breaks the scores down pillar by pillar; the linked profiles cover the underlying repos, docs and community signals in full.
Side-by-side metrics
| Metric | Guild AI | litellm |
|---|---|---|
| Ranking | ||
| Overall rank | #763 | #1114 |
| Pillars | ||
| Overall | 29 | 7 |
| Code | 34 | 0 |
| Education | 65 | 0 |
| Community | 31 | 0 |
| Reach | 9 | 40 |
| Momentum | 0 | 0 |
| Builder experience | 0 | 0 |
| Signals | ||
| Stars | 1,003 | 0 |
| Forks | 111 | 0 |
| Public repos | 29 | 0 |
| Active repos (90d) | 0 | 0 |
| External contributors | 1 | 0 |
| Avg polish | 39 | 0 |
| Avg AI-readiness | 15 | 0 |