Guild AI vs Mage
Developer ecosystem comparison across GitHub activity, SDKs, documentation, community, reach and momentum.
Guild AI and Mage (Magical tools for data.) both appear on the Smoower Developer Ecosystem Index.
Mage (rank #485) holds a modest lead over Guild AI (rank #763) on the overall Smoower ecosystem score (38 vs 29). The gap of 9 points reflects composite signals across code, docs, community and reach.
On education (docs, guides and learning material for developers), Mage is slightly ahead of Guild AI. On community (issue response, PR reviews and discussion health), Mage is slightly ahead of Guild AI. On reach (how visible the ecosystem is beyond its own repos), Mage is clearly ahead of Guild AI. On momentum (release cadence and how fast the ecosystem moves), Mage is ahead of Guild AI.
Guild AI carries 1,003 GitHub stars across 29 public repos, with 0 repositories active in the last 90 days and 1 external contributors on record. Mage shows 9,079 stars across 44 public repos, 8 active in the last 90 days and 22 external contributors. The star gap on its own does not decide the comparison, but Mage's footprint is roughly 9.1x larger, which usually shows up in downstream signals like inbound issues and third party integrations.
Guild AI is worth a look for teams already invested in its stack. Mage looks better where reach is the deciding factor. The table below breaks the scores down pillar by pillar; the linked profiles cover the underlying repos, docs and community signals in full.
Side-by-side metrics
| Metric | Guild AI | Mage |
|---|---|---|
| Ranking | ||
| Overall rank | #763 | #485 |
| Pillars | ||
| Overall | 29 | 38 |
| Code | 34 | 34 |
| Education | 65 | 71 |
| Community | 31 | 38 |
| Reach | 9 | 40 |
| Momentum | 0 | 16 |
| Builder experience | 0 | 0 |
| Signals | ||
| Stars | 1,003 | 9,079 |
| Forks | 111 | 1,538 |
| Public repos | 29 | 44 |
| Active repos (90d) | 0 | 8 |
| External contributors | 1 | 22 |
| Avg polish | 39 | 42 |
| Avg AI-readiness | 15 | 15 |