Guild AI vs Pocus
Developer ecosystem comparison across GitHub activity, SDKs, documentation, community, reach and momentum.
Guild AI and Pocus both appear on the Smoower Developer Ecosystem Index.
Guild AI (rank #763) holds a modest lead over Pocus (rank #1006) on the overall Smoower ecosystem score (29 vs 18). The gap of 11 points reflects composite signals across code, docs, community and reach.
On code quality (the state of repositories, tests, releases and polish), Guild AI is clearly ahead of Pocus. On education (docs, guides and learning material for developers), Guild AI is slightly ahead of Pocus. On community (issue response, PR reviews and discussion health), Guild AI is clearly ahead of Pocus. On reach (how visible the ecosystem is beyond its own repos), Pocus is ahead of Guild AI.
Guild AI carries 1,003 GitHub stars across 29 public repos, with 0 repositories active in the last 90 days and 1 external contributors on record. Pocus shows 0 stars across 0 public repos, 0 active in the last 90 days and 0 external contributors.
Guild AI is the stronger read for anyone weighting code quality. Pocus looks better where reach is the deciding factor. The table below breaks the scores down pillar by pillar; the linked profiles cover the underlying repos, docs and community signals in full.
Side-by-side metrics
| Metric | Guild AI | Pocus |
|---|---|---|
| Ranking | ||
| Overall rank | #763 | #1006 |
| Pillars | ||
| Overall | 29 | 18 |
| Code | 34 | 0 |
| Education | 65 | 60 |
| Community | 31 | 0 |
| Reach | 9 | 18 |
| Momentum | 0 | 0 |
| Builder experience | 0 | 0 |
| Signals | ||
| Stars | 1,003 | 0 |
| Forks | 111 | 0 |
| Public repos | 29 | 0 |
| Active repos (90d) | 0 | 0 |
| External contributors | 1 | 0 |
| Avg polish | 39 | 0 |
| Avg AI-readiness | 15 | 0 |