Gusto vs Increase
Developer ecosystem comparison across GitHub activity, SDKs, documentation, community, reach and momentum.
Gusto and Increase (Build your bank) both appear on the Smoower Developer Ecosystem Index.
Increase (rank #55) holds a modest lead over Gusto (rank #338) on the overall Smoower ecosystem score (60 vs 43). The gap of 17 points reflects composite signals across code, docs, community and reach.
On code quality (the state of repositories, tests, releases and polish), Gusto is slightly ahead of Increase. On education (docs, guides and learning material for developers), Gusto is slightly ahead of Increase. On community (issue response, PR reviews and discussion health), Increase is clearly ahead of Gusto. On reach (how visible the ecosystem is beyond its own repos), Increase is clearly ahead of Gusto. On momentum (release cadence and how fast the ecosystem moves), Increase is ahead of Gusto.
Gusto carries 781 GitHub stars across 148 public repos, with 20 repositories active in the last 90 days and 6 external contributors on record. Increase shows 45 stars across 12 public repos, 11 active in the last 90 days and 5 external contributors. The star gap on its own does not decide the comparison, but Gusto's footprint is roughly 17.4x larger, which usually shows up in downstream signals like inbound issues and third party integrations.
Gusto is the stronger read for anyone weighting code quality. Increase looks better where reach is the deciding factor. The table below breaks the scores down pillar by pillar; the linked profiles cover the underlying repos, docs and community signals in full.
Side-by-side metrics
| Metric | Gusto | Increase |
|---|---|---|
| Ranking | ||
| Overall rank | #338 | #55 |
| Pillars | ||
| Overall | 43 | 60 |
| Code | 60 | 52 |
| Education | 66 | 59 |
| Community | 35 | 68 |
| Reach | 19 | 79 |
| Momentum | 33 | 43 |
| Builder experience | 0 | 0 |
| Signals | ||
| Stars | 781 | 45 |
| Forks | 217 | 15 |
| Public repos | 148 | 12 |
| Active repos (90d) | 20 | 11 |
| External contributors | 6 | 5 |
| Avg polish | 53 | 48 |
| Avg AI-readiness | 48 | 47 |