Gusto vs Kajabi

Gusto and Kajabi both appear on the Smoower Developer Ecosystem Index.

Gusto (rank #338) holds a modest lead over Kajabi (rank #662) on the overall Smoower ecosystem score (43 vs 32). The gap of 11 points reflects composite signals across code, docs, community and reach.

On code quality (the state of repositories, tests, releases and polish), Gusto is ahead of Kajabi. On education (docs, guides and learning material for developers), Gusto is ahead of Kajabi. On community (issue response, PR reviews and discussion health), Gusto is ahead of Kajabi. On reach (how visible the ecosystem is beyond its own repos), Gusto is slightly ahead of Kajabi. On momentum (release cadence and how fast the ecosystem moves), Kajabi is ahead of Gusto.

Gusto carries 781 GitHub stars across 148 public repos, with 20 repositories active in the last 90 days and 6 external contributors on record. Kajabi shows 99 stars across 103 public repos, 8 active in the last 90 days and 11 external contributors. The star gap on its own does not decide the comparison, but Gusto's footprint is roughly 7.9x larger, which usually shows up in downstream signals like inbound issues and third party integrations.

Gusto is the stronger read for anyone weighting community. Kajabi looks better where momentum is the deciding factor. The table below breaks the scores down pillar by pillar; the linked profiles cover the underlying repos, docs and community signals in full.