Gusto vs Miro

Gusto and Miro (Visual workspace for innovation) both appear on the Smoower Developer Ecosystem Index.

Gusto (rank #338) holds a narrow lead over Miro (rank #485) on the overall Smoower ecosystem score (43 vs 38). The gap of 5 points reflects composite signals across code, docs, community and reach.

On code quality (the state of repositories, tests, releases and polish), Gusto is slightly ahead of Miro. On education (docs, guides and learning material for developers), Miro is ahead of Gusto. On community (issue response, PR reviews and discussion health), Gusto is slightly ahead of Miro. On reach (how visible the ecosystem is beyond its own repos), Gusto is ahead of Miro. On momentum (release cadence and how fast the ecosystem moves), Gusto is clearly ahead of Miro.

Gusto carries 781 GitHub stars across 148 public repos, with 20 repositories active in the last 90 days and 6 external contributors on record. Miro shows 843 stars across 45 public repos, 4 active in the last 90 days and 6 external contributors.

Gusto is the stronger read for anyone weighting momentum. Miro looks better where education is the deciding factor. The table below breaks the scores down pillar by pillar; the linked profiles cover the underlying repos, docs and community signals in full.