Gusto vs Stripe Samples
Developer ecosystem comparison across GitHub activity, SDKs, documentation, community, reach and momentum.
Gusto and Stripe Samples (Sample integrations built by Stripe.) both appear on the Smoower Developer Ecosystem Index.
Stripe Samples (rank #141) holds a modest lead over Gusto (rank #338) on the overall Smoower ecosystem score (53 vs 43). The gap of 10 points reflects composite signals across code, docs, community and reach.
On code quality (the state of repositories, tests, releases and polish), Stripe Samples is slightly ahead of Gusto. On education (docs, guides and learning material for developers), Stripe Samples is ahead of Gusto. On community (issue response, PR reviews and discussion health), Stripe Samples is ahead of Gusto. On reach (how visible the ecosystem is beyond its own repos), Gusto is ahead of Stripe Samples. On momentum (release cadence and how fast the ecosystem moves), Stripe Samples is ahead of Gusto.
Gusto carries 781 GitHub stars across 148 public repos, with 20 repositories active in the last 90 days and 6 external contributors on record. Stripe Samples shows 4,227 stars across 30 public repos, 23 active in the last 90 days and 8 external contributors. The star gap on its own does not decide the comparison, but Stripe Samples's footprint is roughly 5.4x larger, which usually shows up in downstream signals like inbound issues and third party integrations.
Gusto is the stronger read for anyone weighting reach. Stripe Samples looks better where education is the deciding factor. The table below breaks the scores down pillar by pillar; the linked profiles cover the underlying repos, docs and community signals in full.
Side-by-side metrics
| Metric | Gusto | Stripe Samples |
|---|---|---|
| Ranking | ||
| Overall rank | #338 | #141 |
| Pillars | ||
| Overall | 43 | 53 |
| Code | 60 | 66 |
| Education | 66 | 85 |
| Community | 35 | 47 |
| Reach | 19 | 8 |
| Momentum | 33 | 52 |
| Builder experience | 0 | 0 |
| Signals | ||
| Stars | 781 | 4,227 |
| Forks | 217 | 2,301 |
| Public repos | 148 | 30 |
| Active repos (90d) | 20 | 23 |
| External contributors | 6 | 8 |
| Avg polish | 53 | 76 |
| Avg AI-readiness | 48 | 34 |