Developer ecosystem comparison
vs

Gusto vs Typeform

Developer ecosystem comparison across GitHub activity, SDKs, documentation, community, reach and momentum.

Gusto and Typeform both appear on the Smoower Developer Ecosystem Index.

Typeform (rank #189) holds a narrow lead over Gusto (rank #338) on the overall Smoower ecosystem score (50 vs 43). The gap of 7 points reflects composite signals across code, docs, community and reach.

On code quality (the state of repositories, tests, releases and polish), Typeform is ahead of Gusto. On education (docs, guides and learning material for developers), Gusto is ahead of Typeform. On community (issue response, PR reviews and discussion health), Gusto is ahead of Typeform. On reach (how visible the ecosystem is beyond its own repos), Typeform is clearly ahead of Gusto. On momentum (release cadence and how fast the ecosystem moves), Gusto is slightly ahead of Typeform.

Gusto carries 781 GitHub stars across 148 public repos, with 20 repositories active in the last 90 days and 6 external contributors on record. Typeform shows 590 stars across 40 public repos, 8 active in the last 90 days and 5 external contributors.

Gusto is the stronger read for anyone weighting education. Typeform looks better where reach is the deciding factor. The table below breaks the scores down pillar by pillar; the linked profiles cover the underlying repos, docs and community signals in full.

Side-by-side metrics

MetricGustoTypeform
Ranking
Overall rank#338#189
Pillars
Overall4350
Code6071
Education6651
Community3525
Reach1943
Momentum3331
Builder experience00
Signals
Stars781590
Forks217254
Public repos14840
Active repos (90d)208
External contributors65
Avg polish5375
Avg AI-readiness4838

Fork ecosystems

Loading fork ecosystem…
Loading fork ecosystem…
View Gusto developer profileView Typeform developer profile