Hashnode vs pCloud Open Source

Hashnode (Everything you need to start blogging as a developer!) and pCloud Open Source both appear on the Smoower Developer Ecosystem Index.

Hashnode (rank #625) holds a narrow lead over pCloud Open Source (rank #668) on the overall Smoower ecosystem score (33 vs 32). The gap of 1 points reflects composite signals across code, docs, community and reach.

On code quality (the state of repositories, tests, releases and polish), Hashnode is ahead of pCloud Open Source. On education (docs, guides and learning material for developers), pCloud Open Source is ahead of Hashnode. On community (issue response, PR reviews and discussion health), Hashnode is ahead of pCloud Open Source. On reach (how visible the ecosystem is beyond its own repos), pCloud Open Source is clearly ahead of Hashnode. On momentum (release cadence and how fast the ecosystem moves), pCloud Open Source is slightly ahead of Hashnode.

Hashnode carries 6,860 GitHub stars across 26 public repos, with 3 repositories active in the last 90 days and 3 external contributors on record. pCloud Open Source shows 868 stars across 16 public repos, 4 active in the last 90 days and 2 external contributors. The star gap on its own does not decide the comparison, but Hashnode's footprint is roughly 7.9x larger, which usually shows up in downstream signals like inbound issues and third party integrations.

Hashnode is the stronger read for anyone weighting code quality. pCloud Open Source looks better where reach is the deciding factor. The table below breaks the scores down pillar by pillar; the linked profiles cover the underlying repos, docs and community signals in full.