Hashnode vs Plausible Analytics

Hashnode (Everything you need to start blogging as a developer!) and Plausible Analytics (Simple, open source, lightweight (< 1 KB) and privacy-friendly alternative to Google Analytics.) both appear on the Smoower Developer Ecosystem Index.

Plausible Analytics (rank #338) holds a modest lead over Hashnode (rank #625) on the overall Smoower ecosystem score (43 vs 33). The gap of 10 points reflects composite signals across code, docs, community and reach.

On code quality (the state of repositories, tests, releases and polish), Plausible Analytics is slightly ahead of Hashnode. On education (docs, guides and learning material for developers), Plausible Analytics is ahead of Hashnode. On community (issue response, PR reviews and discussion health), Plausible Analytics is clearly ahead of Hashnode. On reach (how visible the ecosystem is beyond its own repos), Plausible Analytics is ahead of Hashnode. On momentum (release cadence and how fast the ecosystem moves), Plausible Analytics is clearly ahead of Hashnode.

Hashnode carries 6,853 GitHub stars across 26 public repos, with 3 repositories active in the last 90 days and 3 external contributors on record. Plausible Analytics shows 31,145 stars across 21 public repos, 7 active in the last 90 days and 23 external contributors. The star gap on its own does not decide the comparison, but Plausible Analytics's footprint is roughly 4.5x larger, which usually shows up in downstream signals like inbound issues and third party integrations.

Hashnode is worth a look for teams already invested in its stack. Plausible Analytics looks better where momentum is the deciding factor. The table below breaks the scores down pillar by pillar; the linked profiles cover the underlying repos, docs and community signals in full.