Healthchecks vs Increase

Healthchecks (Open-source cron job and background task monitoring) and Increase (Build your bank) both appear on the Smoower Developer Ecosystem Index.

Increase (rank #55) holds a meaningful lead over Healthchecks (rank #455) on the overall Smoower ecosystem score (60 vs 39). The gap of 21 points reflects composite signals across code, docs, community and reach.

On code quality (the state of repositories, tests, releases and polish), Increase is slightly ahead of Healthchecks. On education (docs, guides and learning material for developers), Healthchecks is ahead of Increase. On community (issue response, PR reviews and discussion health), Increase is clearly ahead of Healthchecks. On reach (how visible the ecosystem is beyond its own repos), Increase is clearly ahead of Healthchecks. On momentum (release cadence and how fast the ecosystem moves), Increase is slightly ahead of Healthchecks.

Healthchecks carries 10,273 GitHub stars across 3 public repos, with 1 repositories active in the last 90 days and 1 external contributors on record. Increase shows 45 stars across 12 public repos, 11 active in the last 90 days and 5 external contributors. The star gap on its own does not decide the comparison, but Healthchecks's footprint is roughly 228.3x larger, which usually shows up in downstream signals like inbound issues and third party integrations.

Healthchecks is the stronger read for anyone weighting education. Increase looks better where reach is the deciding factor. The table below breaks the scores down pillar by pillar; the linked profiles cover the underlying repos, docs and community signals in full.