Product Insights
Join LiveChat Developer Program https://platform.text.com/
Heap vs LiveChat
Developer ecosystem comparison across GitHub activity, SDKs, documentation, community, reach and momentum.
Heap (Product Insights) and LiveChat (Join LiveChat Developer Program https://platform.text.com/) both appear on the Smoower Developer Ecosystem Index.
LiveChat (rank #141) holds a modest lead over Heap (rank #569) on the overall Smoower ecosystem score (53 vs 35). The gap of 18 points reflects composite signals across code, docs, community and reach.
On code quality (the state of repositories, tests, releases and polish), LiveChat is ahead of Heap. On education (docs, guides and learning material for developers), LiveChat is slightly ahead of Heap. On community (issue response, PR reviews and discussion health), LiveChat is clearly ahead of Heap. On reach (how visible the ecosystem is beyond its own repos), LiveChat is ahead of Heap. On momentum (release cadence and how fast the ecosystem moves), LiveChat is clearly ahead of Heap.
Heap carries 215 GitHub stars across 65 public repos, with 6 repositories active in the last 90 days and 1 external contributors on record. LiveChat shows 755 stars across 168 public repos, 24 active in the last 90 days and 13 external contributors. The star gap on its own does not decide the comparison, but LiveChat's footprint is roughly 3.5x larger, which usually shows up in downstream signals like inbound issues and third party integrations.
Heap is worth a look for teams already invested in its stack. LiveChat looks better where momentum is the deciding factor. The table below breaks the scores down pillar by pillar; the linked profiles cover the underlying repos, docs and community signals in full.
Side-by-side metrics
| Metric | Heap | LiveChat |
|---|---|---|
| Ranking | ||
| Overall rank | #569 | #141 |
| Pillars | ||
| Overall | 35 | 53 |
| Code | 35 | 54 |
| Education | 72 | 80 |
| Community | 14 | 36 |
| Reach | 30 | 50 |
| Momentum | 12 | 35 |
| Builder experience | 0 | 0 |
| Signals | ||
| Stars | 215 | 755 |
| Forks | 105 | 335 |
| Public repos | 65 | 168 |
| Active repos (90d) | 6 | 24 |
| External contributors | 1 | 13 |
| Avg polish | 37 | 55 |
| Avg AI-readiness | 23 | 37 |