Developer ecosystem comparison
vs

Heap vs Quo

Developer ecosystem comparison across GitHub activity, SDKs, documentation, community, reach and momentum.

Heap (Product Insights) and Quo (World's best business phone app) both appear on the Smoower Developer Ecosystem Index.

Heap (rank #567) holds a narrow lead over Quo (rank #668) on the overall Smoower ecosystem score (35 vs 32). The gap of 3 points reflects composite signals across code, docs, community and reach.

On code quality (the state of repositories, tests, releases and polish), Heap is slightly ahead of Quo. On education (docs, guides and learning material for developers), Heap is clearly ahead of Quo. On reach (how visible the ecosystem is beyond its own repos), Quo is ahead of Heap. On momentum (release cadence and how fast the ecosystem moves), Quo is clearly ahead of Heap.

Heap carries 215 GitHub stars across 65 public repos, with 6 repositories active in the last 90 days and 0 external contributors on record. Quo shows 12 stars across 20 public repos, 1 active in the last 90 days and 0 external contributors. The star gap on its own does not decide the comparison, but Heap's footprint is roughly 17.9x larger, which usually shows up in downstream signals like inbound issues and third party integrations.

Heap is the stronger read for anyone weighting education. Quo looks better where momentum is the deciding factor. The table below breaks the scores down pillar by pillar; the linked profiles cover the underlying repos, docs and community signals in full.

Side-by-side metrics

MetricHeapQuo
Ranking
Overall rank#567#668
Pillars
Overall3532
Code3532
Education7243
Community1111
Reach3044
Momentum1234
Builder experience00
Signals
Stars21512
Forks1051
Public repos6520
Active repos (90d)61
External contributors00
Avg polish3728
Avg AI-readiness2339

Fork ecosystems

Loading fork ecosystem…
Loading fork ecosystem…
View Heap developer profileView Quo developer profile