Product Insights
SignNow e-signature API - send, sign & embed documents in any app. SDKs for Node.js, Python, PHP, .NET & Java.
Heap vs SignNow
Developer ecosystem comparison across GitHub activity, SDKs, documentation, community, reach and momentum.
Heap (Product Insights) and SignNow (SignNow e-signature API - send, sign & embed documents in any app. SDKs for Node.js, Python, PHP, .NET & Java.) both appear on the Smoower Developer Ecosystem Index.
SignNow (rank #209) holds a modest lead over Heap (rank #569) on the overall Smoower ecosystem score (49 vs 35). The gap of 14 points reflects composite signals across code, docs, community and reach.
On code quality (the state of repositories, tests, releases and polish), SignNow is ahead of Heap. On education (docs, guides and learning material for developers), SignNow is ahead of Heap. On community (issue response, PR reviews and discussion health), SignNow is ahead of Heap. On reach (how visible the ecosystem is beyond its own repos), SignNow is clearly ahead of Heap. On momentum (release cadence and how fast the ecosystem moves), SignNow is clearly ahead of Heap.
Heap carries 215 GitHub stars across 65 public repos, with 6 repositories active in the last 90 days and 1 external contributors on record. SignNow shows 96 stars across 16 public repos, 8 active in the last 90 days and 4 external contributors.
Heap is worth a look for teams already invested in its stack. SignNow looks better where momentum is the deciding factor. The table below breaks the scores down pillar by pillar; the linked profiles cover the underlying repos, docs and community signals in full.
Side-by-side metrics
| Metric | Heap | SignNow |
|---|---|---|
| Ranking | ||
| Overall rank | #569 | #209 |
| Pillars | ||
| Overall | 35 | 49 |
| Code | 35 | 55 |
| Education | 72 | 82 |
| Community | 14 | 26 |
| Reach | 30 | 62 |
| Momentum | 12 | 50 |
| Builder experience | 0 | 0 |
| Signals | ||
| Stars | 215 | 96 |
| Forks | 105 | 98 |
| Public repos | 65 | 16 |
| Active repos (90d) | 6 | 8 |
| External contributors | 1 | 4 |
| Avg polish | 37 | 59 |
| Avg AI-readiness | 23 | 46 |