Product Insights
Heap vs Typeform
Developer ecosystem comparison across GitHub activity, SDKs, documentation, community, reach and momentum.
Heap (Product Insights) and Typeform both appear on the Smoower Developer Ecosystem Index.
Typeform (rank #189) holds a modest lead over Heap (rank #569) on the overall Smoower ecosystem score (50 vs 35). The gap of 15 points reflects composite signals across code, docs, community and reach.
On code quality (the state of repositories, tests, releases and polish), Typeform is clearly ahead of Heap. On education (docs, guides and learning material for developers), Heap is clearly ahead of Typeform. On community (issue response, PR reviews and discussion health), Typeform is ahead of Heap. On reach (how visible the ecosystem is beyond its own repos), Typeform is ahead of Heap. On momentum (release cadence and how fast the ecosystem moves), Typeform is ahead of Heap.
Heap carries 215 GitHub stars across 65 public repos, with 6 repositories active in the last 90 days and 1 external contributors on record. Typeform shows 590 stars across 40 public repos, 8 active in the last 90 days and 5 external contributors.
Heap is the stronger read for anyone weighting education. Typeform looks better where code quality is the deciding factor. The table below breaks the scores down pillar by pillar; the linked profiles cover the underlying repos, docs and community signals in full.
Side-by-side metrics
| Metric | Heap | Typeform |
|---|---|---|
| Ranking | ||
| Overall rank | #569 | #189 |
| Pillars | ||
| Overall | 35 | 50 |
| Code | 35 | 71 |
| Education | 72 | 51 |
| Community | 14 | 25 |
| Reach | 30 | 43 |
| Momentum | 12 | 31 |
| Builder experience | 0 | 0 |
| Signals | ||
| Stars | 215 | 590 |
| Forks | 105 | 254 |
| Public repos | 65 | 40 |
| Active repos (90d) | 6 | 8 |
| External contributors | 1 | 5 |
| Avg polish | 37 | 75 |
| Avg AI-readiness | 23 | 38 |