Developer ecosystem comparison
vs
WR
Wrike
@wrike
Rank #600
Score 34
SaaS

Welcome to the Wrike TechClub open source community. Let's make tech world better together! NB: members must have two-factor auth.

Heap vs Wrike

Developer ecosystem comparison across GitHub activity, SDKs, documentation, community, reach and momentum.

Heap (Product Insights) and Wrike (Welcome to the Wrike TechClub open source community. Let's make tech world better together! NB: members must have two-factor auth.) both appear on the Smoower Developer Ecosystem Index.

Heap (rank #567) holds a narrow lead over Wrike (rank #600) on the overall Smoower ecosystem score (35 vs 34). The gap of 1 points reflects composite signals across code, docs, community and reach.

On code quality (the state of repositories, tests, releases and polish), Wrike is ahead of Heap. On education (docs, guides and learning material for developers), Wrike is slightly ahead of Heap. On reach (how visible the ecosystem is beyond its own repos), Heap is ahead of Wrike. On momentum (release cadence and how fast the ecosystem moves), Wrike is ahead of Heap.

Heap carries 215 GitHub stars across 65 public repos, with 6 repositories active in the last 90 days and 0 external contributors on record. Wrike shows 276 stars across 33 public repos, 1 active in the last 90 days and 0 external contributors.

Heap is the stronger read for anyone weighting reach. Wrike looks better where momentum is the deciding factor. The table below breaks the scores down pillar by pillar; the linked profiles cover the underlying repos, docs and community signals in full.

Side-by-side metrics

MetricHeapWrike
Ranking
Overall rank#567#600
Pillars
Overall3534
Code3549
Education7277
Community1111
Reach3015
Momentum1230
Builder experience00
Signals
Stars215276
Forks10561
Public repos6533
Active repos (90d)61
External contributors00
Avg polish3748
Avg AI-readiness2330

Fork ecosystems

Loading fork ecosystem…
Loading fork ecosystem…
View Heap developer profileView Wrike developer profile