Dropbox Sign vs mParticle by Rokt
Developer ecosystem comparison across GitHub activity, SDKs, documentation, community, reach and momentum.
Dropbox Sign and mParticle by Rokt both appear on the Smoower Developer Ecosystem Index.
mParticle by Rokt (rank #338) holds a narrow lead over Dropbox Sign (rank #430) on the overall Smoower ecosystem score (43 vs 40). The gap of 3 points reflects composite signals across code, docs, community and reach.
On code quality (the state of repositories, tests, releases and polish), Dropbox Sign is slightly ahead of mParticle by Rokt. On education (docs, guides and learning material for developers), Dropbox Sign is ahead of mParticle by Rokt. On community (issue response, PR reviews and discussion health), mParticle by Rokt is ahead of Dropbox Sign. On reach (how visible the ecosystem is beyond its own repos), Dropbox Sign is slightly ahead of mParticle by Rokt. On momentum (release cadence and how fast the ecosystem moves), mParticle by Rokt is slightly ahead of Dropbox Sign.
Dropbox Sign carries 434 GitHub stars across 36 public repos, with 9 repositories active in the last 90 days and 3 external contributors on record. mParticle by Rokt shows 317 stars across 85 public repos, 14 active in the last 90 days and 21 external contributors.
Dropbox Sign is the stronger read for anyone weighting education. mParticle by Rokt looks better where community is the deciding factor. The table below breaks the scores down pillar by pillar; the linked profiles cover the underlying repos, docs and community signals in full.
Side-by-side metrics
| Metric | Dropbox Sign | mParticle by Rokt |
|---|---|---|
| Ranking | ||
| Overall rank | #430 | #338 |
| Pillars | ||
| Overall | 40 | 43 |
| Code | 61 | 59 |
| Education | 75 | 63 |
| Community | 20 | 38 |
| Reach | 31 | 28 |
| Momentum | 19 | 27 |
| Builder experience | 0 | 0 |
| Signals | ||
| Stars | 434 | 317 |
| Forks | 326 | 521 |
| Public repos | 36 | 85 |
| Active repos (90d) | 9 | 14 |
| External contributors | 3 | 21 |
| Avg polish | 59 | 62 |
| Avg AI-readiness | 47 | 50 |