Dropbox Sign vs Qonto
Developer ecosystem comparison across GitHub activity, SDKs, documentation, community, reach and momentum.
Dropbox Sign and Qonto both appear on the Smoower Developer Ecosystem Index.
Qonto (rank #338) holds a narrow lead over Dropbox Sign (rank #430) on the overall Smoower ecosystem score (43 vs 40). The gap of 3 points reflects composite signals across code, docs, community and reach.
On code quality (the state of repositories, tests, releases and polish), Dropbox Sign is slightly ahead of Qonto. On community (issue response, PR reviews and discussion health), Qonto is slightly ahead of Dropbox Sign. On reach (how visible the ecosystem is beyond its own repos), Dropbox Sign is slightly ahead of Qonto. On momentum (release cadence and how fast the ecosystem moves), Qonto is slightly ahead of Dropbox Sign.
Dropbox Sign carries 434 GitHub stars across 36 public repos, with 9 repositories active in the last 90 days and 3 external contributors on record. Qonto shows 501 stars across 75 public repos, 11 active in the last 90 days and 5 external contributors.
Dropbox Sign is the stronger read for anyone weighting reach. Qonto looks better where community is the deciding factor. The table below breaks the scores down pillar by pillar; the linked profiles cover the underlying repos, docs and community signals in full.
Side-by-side metrics
| Metric | Dropbox Sign | Qonto |
|---|---|---|
| Ranking | ||
| Overall rank | #430 | #338 |
| Pillars | ||
| Overall | 40 | 43 |
| Code | 61 | 57 |
| Education | 75 | 75 |
| Community | 20 | 25 |
| Reach | 31 | 24 |
| Momentum | 19 | 21 |
| Builder experience | 0 | 0 |
| Signals | ||
| Stars | 434 | 501 |
| Forks | 326 | 158 |
| Public repos | 36 | 75 |
| Active repos (90d) | 9 | 11 |
| External contributors | 3 | 5 |
| Avg polish | 59 | 62 |
| Avg AI-readiness | 47 | 36 |