Product Experience Insights Tools
Hotjar vs Lightspeed Commerce Inc.
Developer ecosystem comparison across GitHub activity, SDKs, documentation, community, reach and momentum.
Hotjar (Product Experience Insights Tools) and Lightspeed Commerce Inc. both appear on the Smoower Developer Ecosystem Index.
Hotjar (rank #317) holds a narrow lead over Lightspeed Commerce Inc. (rank #485) on the overall Smoower ecosystem score (44 vs 38). The gap of 6 points reflects composite signals across code, docs, community and reach.
On code quality (the state of repositories, tests, releases and polish), Hotjar is slightly ahead of Lightspeed Commerce Inc.. On education (docs, guides and learning material for developers), Hotjar is ahead of Lightspeed Commerce Inc.. On community (issue response, PR reviews and discussion health), Lightspeed Commerce Inc. is ahead of Hotjar. On reach (how visible the ecosystem is beyond its own repos), Hotjar is clearly ahead of Lightspeed Commerce Inc.. On momentum (release cadence and how fast the ecosystem moves), Lightspeed Commerce Inc. is slightly ahead of Hotjar.
Hotjar carries 52 GitHub stars across 2 public repos, with 1 repositories active in the last 90 days and 2 external contributors on record. Lightspeed Commerce Inc. shows 145 stars across 6 public repos, 0 active in the last 90 days and 2 external contributors.
Hotjar is the stronger read for anyone weighting reach. Lightspeed Commerce Inc. looks better where community is the deciding factor. The table below breaks the scores down pillar by pillar; the linked profiles cover the underlying repos, docs and community signals in full.
Side-by-side metrics
| Metric | Hotjar | Lightspeed Commerce Inc. |
|---|---|---|
| Ranking | ||
| Overall rank | #317 | #485 |
| Pillars | ||
| Overall | 44 | 38 |
| Code | 56 | 51 |
| Education | 88 | 69 |
| Community | 22 | 33 |
| Reach | 62 | 15 |
| Momentum | 24 | 28 |
| Builder experience | 0 | 0 |
| Signals | ||
| Stars | 52 | 145 |
| Forks | 10 | 19 |
| Public repos | 2 | 6 |
| Active repos (90d) | 1 | 0 |
| External contributors | 2 | 2 |
| Avg polish | 45 | 54 |
| Avg AI-readiness | 60 | 22 |