Product Experience Insights Tools
Hotjar vs Lodgify
Developer ecosystem comparison across GitHub activity, SDKs, documentation, community, reach and momentum.
Hotjar (Product Experience Insights Tools) and Lodgify both appear on the Smoower Developer Ecosystem Index.
Hotjar (rank #317) holds a modest lead over Lodgify (rank #728) on the overall Smoower ecosystem score (44 vs 30). The gap of 14 points reflects composite signals across code, docs, community and reach.
On code quality (the state of repositories, tests, releases and polish), Hotjar is ahead of Lodgify. On education (docs, guides and learning material for developers), Hotjar is clearly ahead of Lodgify. On community (issue response, PR reviews and discussion health), Hotjar is ahead of Lodgify. On reach (how visible the ecosystem is beyond its own repos), Hotjar is clearly ahead of Lodgify. On momentum (release cadence and how fast the ecosystem moves), Lodgify is ahead of Hotjar.
Hotjar carries 52 GitHub stars across 2 public repos, with 1 repositories active in the last 90 days and 2 external contributors on record. Lodgify shows 13 stars across 16 public repos, 3 active in the last 90 days and 0 external contributors. The star gap on its own does not decide the comparison, but Hotjar's footprint is roughly 4.0x larger, which usually shows up in downstream signals like inbound issues and third party integrations.
Hotjar is the stronger read for anyone weighting reach. Lodgify looks better where momentum is the deciding factor. The table below breaks the scores down pillar by pillar; the linked profiles cover the underlying repos, docs and community signals in full.
Side-by-side metrics
| Metric | Hotjar | Lodgify |
|---|---|---|
| Ranking | ||
| Overall rank | #317 | #728 |
| Pillars | ||
| Overall | 44 | 30 |
| Code | 56 | 36 |
| Education | 88 | 65 |
| Community | 22 | 8 |
| Reach | 62 | 7 |
| Momentum | 24 | 39 |
| Builder experience | 0 | 0 |
| Signals | ||
| Stars | 52 | 13 |
| Forks | 10 | 76 |
| Public repos | 2 | 16 |
| Active repos (90d) | 1 | 3 |
| External contributors | 2 | 0 |
| Avg polish | 45 | 35 |
| Avg AI-readiness | 60 | 24 |