Hotjar vs Miro

Hotjar (Product Experience Insights Tools) and Miro (Visual workspace for innovation) both appear on the Smoower Developer Ecosystem Index.

Hotjar (rank #317) holds a narrow lead over Miro (rank #485) on the overall Smoower ecosystem score (44 vs 38). The gap of 6 points reflects composite signals across code, docs, community and reach.

On code quality (the state of repositories, tests, releases and polish), Miro is slightly ahead of Hotjar. On education (docs, guides and learning material for developers), Hotjar is slightly ahead of Miro. On community (issue response, PR reviews and discussion health), Miro is ahead of Hotjar. On reach (how visible the ecosystem is beyond its own repos), Hotjar is clearly ahead of Miro. On momentum (release cadence and how fast the ecosystem moves), Hotjar is ahead of Miro.

Hotjar carries 52 GitHub stars across 2 public repos, with 1 repositories active in the last 90 days and 2 external contributors on record. Miro shows 843 stars across 45 public repos, 4 active in the last 90 days and 6 external contributors. The star gap on its own does not decide the comparison, but Miro's footprint is roughly 16.2x larger, which usually shows up in downstream signals like inbound issues and third party integrations.

Hotjar is the stronger read for anyone weighting reach. Miro looks better where community is the deciding factor. The table below breaks the scores down pillar by pillar; the linked profiles cover the underlying repos, docs and community signals in full.