Hotjar vs Quo

Hotjar (Product Experience Insights Tools) and Quo (World's best business phone app) both appear on the Smoower Developer Ecosystem Index.

Hotjar (rank #317) holds a modest lead over Quo (rank #625) on the overall Smoower ecosystem score (44 vs 33). The gap of 11 points reflects composite signals across code, docs, community and reach.

On code quality (the state of repositories, tests, releases and polish), Hotjar is clearly ahead of Quo. On education (docs, guides and learning material for developers), Hotjar is clearly ahead of Quo. On community (issue response, PR reviews and discussion health), Hotjar is ahead of Quo. On reach (how visible the ecosystem is beyond its own repos), Hotjar is ahead of Quo. On momentum (release cadence and how fast the ecosystem moves), Quo is ahead of Hotjar.

Hotjar carries 52 GitHub stars across 2 public repos, with 1 repositories active in the last 90 days and 2 external contributors on record. Quo shows 12 stars across 20 public repos, 2 active in the last 90 days and 0 external contributors. The star gap on its own does not decide the comparison, but Hotjar's footprint is roughly 4.3x larger, which usually shows up in downstream signals like inbound issues and third party integrations.

Hotjar is the stronger read for anyone weighting education. Quo looks better where momentum is the deciding factor. The table below breaks the scores down pillar by pillar; the linked profiles cover the underlying repos, docs and community signals in full.