Hotjar vs Typeform

Hotjar (Product Experience Insights Tools) and Typeform both appear on the Smoower Developer Ecosystem Index.

Typeform (rank #189) holds a narrow lead over Hotjar (rank #317) on the overall Smoower ecosystem score (50 vs 44). The gap of 6 points reflects composite signals across code, docs, community and reach.

On code quality (the state of repositories, tests, releases and polish), Typeform is ahead of Hotjar. On education (docs, guides and learning material for developers), Hotjar is clearly ahead of Typeform. On community (issue response, PR reviews and discussion health), Typeform is slightly ahead of Hotjar. On reach (how visible the ecosystem is beyond its own repos), Hotjar is ahead of Typeform. On momentum (release cadence and how fast the ecosystem moves), Typeform is slightly ahead of Hotjar.

Hotjar carries 52 GitHub stars across 2 public repos, with 1 repositories active in the last 90 days and 2 external contributors on record. Typeform shows 590 stars across 40 public repos, 8 active in the last 90 days and 5 external contributors. The star gap on its own does not decide the comparison, but Typeform's footprint is roughly 11.3x larger, which usually shows up in downstream signals like inbound issues and third party integrations.

Hotjar is the stronger read for anyone weighting education. Typeform looks better where code quality is the deciding factor. The table below breaks the scores down pillar by pillar; the linked profiles cover the underlying repos, docs and community signals in full.