Product Experience Insights Tools
Uptime.com is an industry-leading website monitoring solution.
Hotjar vs Uptime.com
Developer ecosystem comparison across GitHub activity, SDKs, documentation, community, reach and momentum.
Hotjar (Product Experience Insights Tools) and Uptime.com (Uptime.com is an industry-leading website monitoring solution.) both appear on the Smoower Developer Ecosystem Index.
Hotjar (rank #317) holds a modest lead over Uptime.com (rank #625) on the overall Smoower ecosystem score (44 vs 33). The gap of 11 points reflects composite signals across code, docs, community and reach.
On code quality (the state of repositories, tests, releases and polish), Hotjar is ahead of Uptime.com. On education (docs, guides and learning material for developers), Hotjar is clearly ahead of Uptime.com. On community (issue response, PR reviews and discussion health), Uptime.com is slightly ahead of Hotjar. On reach (how visible the ecosystem is beyond its own repos), Hotjar is clearly ahead of Uptime.com. On momentum (release cadence and how fast the ecosystem moves), Uptime.com is slightly ahead of Hotjar.
Hotjar carries 52 GitHub stars across 2 public repos, with 1 repositories active in the last 90 days and 2 external contributors on record. Uptime.com shows 35 stars across 9 public repos, 6 active in the last 90 days and 4 external contributors.
Hotjar is the stronger read for anyone weighting education. Uptime.com looks better where momentum is the deciding factor. The table below breaks the scores down pillar by pillar; the linked profiles cover the underlying repos, docs and community signals in full.
Side-by-side metrics
| Metric | Hotjar | Uptime.com |
|---|---|---|
| Ranking | ||
| Overall rank | #317 | #625 |
| Pillars | ||
| Overall | 44 | 33 |
| Code | 56 | 36 |
| Education | 88 | 65 |
| Community | 22 | 28 |
| Reach | 62 | 39 |
| Momentum | 24 | 31 |
| Builder experience | 0 | 0 |
| Signals | ||
| Stars | 52 | 35 |
| Forks | 10 | 34 |
| Public repos | 2 | 9 |
| Active repos (90d) | 1 | 6 |
| External contributors | 2 | 4 |
| Avg polish | 45 | 42 |
| Avg AI-readiness | 60 | 29 |